December 5, 2004 journal, dumping the Secretary General, dragging in old used soldiers.

Strange things going on in Washington with the War Department drafting back soldiers to fight that have been out of service for years according to 60 minutes today; those officers have not resigned their commission. The military is desperate for warm body targets to stop bullets in Iraq. The campaign to replace the Secretary General of the United Nations is to get him before he gets us through investigating of war crimes in their Iraqi Cool War. Information being circulated indicates this administration is going after its opposition to the war. Opposition from within the Cabinet have all resigned and left the puppet to him. I am fully convinced that this maniac will take us right on into the Battle of Armageddon. There is no stopping place for a lunatic predisposed to self-destruction of the entire world. They are calling up every one to active duty in their desperation and the draft will be next. Reports of many desertions or many who refuse to report for active duty which is leading I believe to an all-out mutiny on the killing fields as soldiers see the light on the atrocities. “Subject: WHO IS PUSHING "THOUGHT CRIME" LEGISLATION? ANSWER: -The same ones who have been incessantly pushing forced association in the G-7 European nations but who do not practice it in their own nation. The same ones who have been pushing hiring, set a sides, and educational quotas in the G-7 nations yet do not do so in their own nation. The same ones who are pushing forced homogenization of all the world's tribes but their own. And that is precisely why they are pushing legislation to muzzle anyone who would speak out against them” Forward by West as description of following. PRINCIPALITIES & POWERS October 20, 2004 NEW LAW MOVES TOWARD CRIMINALIZATION OF THOUGHT by Samuel Francis “A tip of the hat to the Department of State, which had the guts and good sense to express its opposition (sort of) to congressional legislation creating an office for monitoring "anti-Semitism." The bill passed both houses of Congress by voice vote and was signed into law by Pre. Bush last week. It's a very silly and dangerous measure”. "We opposed creation of a separate office for the purpose and opposed mandating of a separate annual report," a State Department spokesman told the press. "We expressed the view that separate reports on different religions/ethnicities were not warranted, given that we already prepare human rights reports and religious freedom reports on 190 countries." But the department isn't dumb. Having seen how easily it passed, the spokesman explained also why the law really wasn't a problem after all. "It's more of a bureaucratic nuisance than a real problem. We are not going to fight a bill that has gained such political momentum." You bet your pension you're not. The bill did not, of course, pass Congress because there was such a massive groundswell of grass-roots support for it. It passed because Jewish organizations demanded it, and no sitting politician wants to get on the wrong side of these groups. That's why the bill passed the Senate by agreement and the House by voice vote - there's no debate and no record of how anyone voted. Pushed by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith and most other major Jewish organizations, the bill requires the department to record acts of physical v-iolence against J-e-ws, their property, cemeteries and places of worship abroad, and the response of local governments to them. As the department notes, it already issues reports on "human rights" abuses, and there's no special reason why attacks on J-e-w-s should be recorded separately. Why not reports about attacks on other groups -the black people, white people, women, Christians? If the lobbies that represent such categories can make enough noise for it, there would be such reports. The State Department could then spend all its time recording what should be the concern of local police departments. The department was right the first time that the bill requires a duplication of what it already does, but that's not what's really wrong with the law. What's wrong with it is that it opens one more door to the criminalization of thought and expression. The bill requires only that acts of physical violence against Jews be recorded, not expressions of anti-Semitism,”